Saturday, January 19, 2008

Ron Paul is Why I Like Obama

In Iowa, New Hampshire, and Michigan Ron Paul has garnered 10%, 8%, and 6% of the GOP primary votes respectively. He's polling right around 5% in SC and 7% in Nevada. Its probably a safe bet that Ron Paul is not going to be the next president of the US. But, what is interesting about Ron Paul's results is that he seems to have garnered the support of anywhere from 5-8% of the voting public in most states.

So what is it about Ron Paul, an obvious fringe candidate, that strikes such a chord with such a significant chunk of voters? I think it is his emphasis on individual liberties. The past 7 years have been characterized by diminishing civil liberties. I need not go down the entire list, but a few examples would be warrantless wiretapping, suspension of habeas corpus rights for some US citizens, etc. We all know the overt source of this trend, Rudy Giuliani has even built a presidential campaign around it. But 9/11's impact on US domestic policy is epiphenomenal. The root of the problem is fear, or more particularly, fear-mongering by members of our federal government used to justify further encroachment on our basic civil liberties.

So what does any of this have to do with Obama? Well, I'll tell you.

Most of what Obama has to say about policy is in line with what you would expect someone just slightly left of center to say. But that is not why people like Obama. The common, and I think faulty, consensus on Obama's appeal is charisma and great speeches. It is true that Obama delivers very rousing speeches that pull at the heartstrings of many people. But there is a subtle difference between Obama's message and that of the other Democrats that I think is the real reason people support him. See, Obama's message is not about what he can do as President, it is about what the American people can do to change the course of the country. Obama's message is not one of entitlement, but of empowerment, and that is the most democratic message that I have heard from any candidate.

I think he's on to something. I think that there is a large segment of the American public that is tired of seeing what the government can do and wants the power back in their own hands. Just as Ron Paul appeals to the libertarian right, Obama appeals to the libertarian left. The difference between the two in terms of election results is that there are simply more Americans who find themselves leaning left this time around.

4 comments:

Dominik Hennig said...

I like Ron Paul and Barack Obama too! :-)

Anthony Palmer, Ph.D. said...

This is a good post, but I'm not so sure I'd use the term "libertarian left." I haven't heard much from Obama in terms of libertarian rhetoric. I think he's more of a grassroots left-leaning candidate instead. But I agree with your larger argument of Obama being able to galvanize and bring new voters into the process. He's more of a movement, rather than just a candidate.

Anonymous said...

I think Ron Paul is significantly less libertarian than people realize, especially when it comes to social issues. His "We the People Act" (link below) has this gem:
"The Supreme Court of the United States and each Federal court... shall not adjudicate--

(A) any claim involving the laws, regulations, or policies of any State or unit of local government relating to the free exercise or establishment of religion;

(B) any claim based upon the right of privacy, including any such claim related to any issue of sexual practices, orientation, or reproduction"

I'd say that's putting Federalism significantly above individual liberty. Paul (and many of his ardent followers) are really more Constitutionalists than libertarian, especially when it comes to social issues. I can buy a libertarian opposition to abortion (if you think it's murder, you have an obligation to outlaw it), but by restraining the federal government, he allows state and local governments to invade people's homes and bedrooms... and that's not libertarianism. It's federalism.

"We the People Act" http://www.thomas.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.300.IH:

Weaver Beaver said...

classic: you really think a liberal democrat distinguishes between personal empowerment and personal entitlement?

check the man's track record. oh wait, never mind, he doesn't have one.